User talk:Dr Gangrene

Welcome!

Hello, Dr Gangrene, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  -- Etz Haim 10:06, 27 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Undercapitalization

I recently did an overhaul on this topic, making it more general. Not particularly satisfied - think it needs a review. I noticed that you did edited this one some time ago. Is there a formal way of requesting subject matter expert review? Aymatth2 (talk) 19:25, 13 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your work on legal research

I noticed you added the cleanup tag to legal research, and have done some cleanup yourself on it. Thanks - I've also done some further cleanup. It's a great and interesting article, but it does need to be hacked apart and reconstructed somewhat to fit the more sparse and simplified style of Wikipedia. Good luck in your future Wikipedia contributions, if you have any questions, feel free to bug me on my Talk page. JesseW 4 July 2005 09:05 (UTC)

You might also want to create a User page - you don't have to say anything about yourself if you don't want to, but it will show up with each edit you make, and unless you want to look like a noob, a blue User page link helps. ;-) JesseW 4 July 2005 09:07 (UTC)

Moisturizer

Hi. I am proposing that moisturizer and emollient exchange some of their sections. I see that you had previously contributed, so I would value your thoughts on my comments in Talk:Moisturizer. - David Ruben 18:24, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Translation

My unending thanks! I award you this translation award as a mere token of my appreciation for your work in translating Magister officiorum. —ScouterSig 14:32, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Dr. Gangrene, I come to you requesting assistance. I have finally given up hope on the official translation channels to get this translated from German to English. I began a quick search for a user who knows both German and English, and you also have an interest in history. So I ask that, if it is not too much, you might assist me in this. The German article is here. Please contact me if you have any questions at all. —ScouterSig 05:00, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Just done. Wasn't too difficult. Dr Gangrene 11:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Michael david winery

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Michael david winery, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Michael david winery is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Michael david winery, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:33, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

Your userpage

Xgmx (talk · contribs) placed you in the nonexistent Category:SS free advocates in this edit. I'm letting you know in case you hadn't noticed, and don't want to be in this category. Someguy1221 (talk) 04:55, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Dr Gangrene (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2007 (UTC)

Cuban artists

Hello, Dr Gangrene ... your cleanups to articles listed in Category:Cuban contemporary artists are commendable, but what these articles really need is reliable sources to verify meeting the WP:BIO criteria ... please see Category talk:Cuban contemporary artists#Continuing deletions, and perhaps you would like to add your name to the list of editors on this fledgling project ... Happy Editing! —72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) 23:09, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

"Cuban artists" checklist

OK, none of these editors

• ArleArt (talk · contribs)
• Callelinea (talk · contribs)
• Dr Gangrene (talk · contribs)
• EdJohnston (talk · contribs)
• Ethicoaestheticist (talk · contribs)
• MBisanz (talk · contribs)
• Pharmboy (talk · contribs)

have contributed to this "Cuban artists" checklist (although there have been limited dialogs on some talk pages) ... some of them either initiated or declined PRODs, and I have asked them politely to record their actions on the checklist (like renaming/merging articles) … I mean, declining a seconded PROD without even an edit summary? What's up with that?

Well, I'm sick of playing Sisyphus and cleaning up after them, so I have deleted these articles from my watchlist, and Some Other Editor can maintain/update it … or not.

In any event, it is time for me to MOVE ON. :-)

Happy Editing! — 72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) _{03:52, 8 February 2008 (UTC)}

{{Oldprodfull}}

Hello again, Dr Gangrene ... please see this talk page and tell me what you think of my newly created Template:Oldprodfull ... would you use it, or update it if you encountered it?

Also, what are your thoughts on my proposed WP:FLAG-BIO protocol?

Happy Editing! — 72.75.72.63 (talk · contribs) _{14:48, 11 February 2008 (UTC)}

Help to verify the article "Corruption in Ghana" for a phd-thesis

Dear Wikipedia's,

I'm a student from Berlin and I'm currently writing my phd-thesis about governance in Ghana. I need to get an overview of the political corruption since independence together and I didn't find a better article about the topic than the one on wikipedia.

Probably you know, that I can't quote wikipedia in an phd-thesis and the sources that are at the bottom of the text aren't precisely refering to certain parts of the article.

Do you maby have information, reports, articles, just anything that is related to corruption in ghana since independence, or to the article in order to make it possible for me to refer to it in the phd-thesis?

Maby above all the people, that have contributed to the article!

It would be great, if you could help me any further.

Thanks a lot in advance,

AndreasAndreas audretsch (talk) 15:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

RTFM pointers for Flag templates

Hello, Dr Gangrene. You have new messages at 151.200.237.53's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

— 151.200.237.53 (talk · contribs) _{23:58, 9 July 2008 (UTC)}

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice

Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Wikipedia:Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 22:24, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

AWB

I approved your request for using AWB. Please use the latest version found in http://toolserver.org/~awb/snapshots/ and remember that you should avoid making insignificant or inconsequential edits such as only adding or removing some white space, moving a stub tag, converting some HTML to Unicode, removing underscores from links (unless they are bad links), or something equally trivial. This is because it wastes resources and clogs up watch lists. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:37, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

Hermann Föttinger

Thanks.Wdl1961 (talk) 15:45, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Hayden Tee

Thanks. Drmies (talk) 00:20, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Corruption in Ghana

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Corruption in Ghana. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corruption in Ghana. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles

I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 01:41, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Arthur Goldstein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Lipiny and Karl Schröder

Communist Workers' Party of Germany (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Karl Schröder

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Müllenheim, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ill (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Martin Ernst von Schlieffen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bernau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:38, 3 October 2013 (UTC)

A page you started (Wedel (family)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Wedel (family), Dr Gangrene!

Wikipedia editor The Cosmos Master just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

An interesting article. Good work.

To reply, leave a comment on The Cosmos Master's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Ways to improve Schloss Thorn

Hi, I'm The Cosmos Master. Dr Gangrene, thanks for creating Schloss Thorn!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This article needs references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. The Cosmos Master (talk) 19:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Nicholas Margue

Hi, I'm The Cosmos Master. Dr Gangrene, thanks for creating Nicholas Margue!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page shuold have references

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. The Cosmos Master (talk) 21:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Schlieffen (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Imperial Diet, Marienhof and Herrschaft

Adolphe, Grand Duke of Luxembourg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hohenburg

Dupong-Krier Ministry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to René Blum

Gaspard-Théodore-Ignace de la Fontaine (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to William I

Groeben family (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Kingdom of Poland

Stadtbredimus Castle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Worms

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to History of rail transport in Luxembourg may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• :: [[Hagen, Luxembourg|Hagen] - [[Kleinbettingen]] (1,11 km).

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:34, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	Luxembourg Barnstar of National Merit
	For your many contributions to the coverage of Luxembourg over the past few weeks, including an amazing number of carefully prepared new articles. Great work! Keep it up. ♦ Ipigott (talk) 14:05, 16 October 2013 (UTC)

Translation

You don't need to make excuses about translation: it's extremely important to extend Wikipedia's coverage in other languages to the more widely accessed EN wiki. Your command of French, German and Luxembourgish is a considerable asset. And in any case, your lengthy, well documented Steel industry in Luxembourg is far more than mere translation. It provides an excellent historical account from a variety of sources.--Ipigott (talk) 07:53, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jean-Georges Willmar

Hi, I'm Sulfurboy. Dr Gangrene, thanks for creating Jean-Georges Willmar!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add sources for your article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Sulfurboy (talk) 22:38, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

La Clef du cabinet des princes de l'Europe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Enlightenment, Valence, Absolutism and Charles IV

Consultative Assembly (Luxembourg) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to René Blum

Diekirch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Old Franconian

Jean-Théodore Laurent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Chersonesus

Steel industry in Luxembourg (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Burbach

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:30, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

Fortress of Luxembourg

Thanks, Dr Gangrene, for thinking of me in connection with a peer review of this article. Let me first congratulate you on expanding it so well and for basing your improvements on a variety of interesting sources. It has certainly come a long way since you changed the title on 8 October. Rather than going into the formal review process which would normally consist of drawing up a list of problems to be addressed in bringing the article up to GA status or higher, I would prefer simply to go through it and make improvements as I go along. At first sight, in addition to copy-editing, I think the main problems are probably the lack of inline sourcing (there is a requirement for at least one reference for each paragraph) and perhaps the need for more details of the remains (and rediscovery) of the fortifications today. As a first step, I would be happy to go through the article and sort things out as I go along. I think this would be a useful exercise as it has been very much a one-man job up to now. I could then, if you wish, suggest other editors who might like to help with a peer review or simply with further improvements. Please let me know if you are happy with this approach. It may take me a day or two to look at it properly as I am involved with other work at the moment in connection with my Danish interests. By the way, I was happy to see you have included many of the historic paintings I added to Commons in connection with my coverage of Luxembourg's culture.--Ipigott (talk) 15:30, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick response. Glad to hear you agree to my suggestions. Thanks too for the additions on the "Remains and later use", but please add sources. I'll try to look through the article tomorrow (Tuesday the 28th).--Ipigott (talk) 20:12, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

I've now been through most of the article, mainly working on the prose and adding a few references where there were none before. I have compared your additions with the articles from which they have been drawn and note that in several cases they are almost word-for-word translations of the original. In order to avoid accusations of plagiarism, you might like to carry out more paraphrasing. This might also provide an opportunity to work more strictly on the chronology and avoid some of the duplication. The article would benefit from additional illustratins. The articles in Ons Stad are beautifully illustrated and I have also come across this article which is rich in illustrations. Some of the illustrations are obviously still in copyright while others are historic documents which are out of copyright and could be reused. I'm sure there must also be many other photographs out of copyright which you could use in the article. I'm still a little worried about the inclusion of the "Gibraltar of the North" in this article. It would help to provide more background on this in the body of the article. And finally, the lead now needs to reflect the main lines of the sections you have added. If I have inadvertently introduced any changes with which you disagree, just revert or edit them out. Let me know if I can be of any further help.--Ipigott (talk) 12:43, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

I see there are now quite a few specific suggestions on the review page. Although I seem to have fixed a few of the problems in going through the article, there are still quite a number requiring attention. For the time being, I think it would be better for me to leave these to you but would be happy to help out if you need assistance. Just let me know on my talk page.--Ipigott (talk) 11:53, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

In regard to illustrations, you could certainly add some of those from the Ons Stad articles. I believe there is a way of copying them directly from the PDF files but I don't know how to do it myself. The only way I can manage it is to print off the page in question and then rescan. But first I'll look for other sources. As for following up on the comments in the peer review, may I humbly suggest that you could have a go at them first. You may or may not agree to them and you are certainly more familiar with the sources than I am at this stage. You may also like to give some reactions on the review page, explaining how you've followed up, etc. I'll give you a few days and then see what else needs to be done. I'm glad to see the article is progressing along the right lines.--Ipigott (talk) 15:33, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

In regard to copyright, as a general rule if the author of the work has been dead for more than 70 years, his works are out of copyright. The normal practice in Commons is to work on the basis of 71 years in order to avoid complications. That means that if the author died in 1942 or before his works can be included. You can use Commons upload, selecting "It is from somewhere else" (which will bring you to this and, under licensing choose "Author died more than 70 (or 100) years ago, etc." This can apply to any work: text, paintings, photographs, maps, etc. The three images in the Ons Stad article you cite are therefore out of copyright. Don't worry too much about the copyright sign or other claims of copyright in connection with two-dimensional images. The sign is widely used incorrectly, often as a photographer wishes to protect his work but this is not valid. I would advise against the use of "Reproduction of a painting because of its age" as there can be complications. If you have any doubts, let me know.--Ipigott (talk) 13:11, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Minette (ore)

Greetings! I have nominated Minette (ore) for a Did You Know listing, and was asked there to provide sources for the proposition that Minette "was deposited in the south of Luxembourg and in Lorraine in the Early Jurassic and Middle Jurassic", which is indicated in the lede, but not elsewhere in the article. Can you provide sources for this? Cheers! bd2412 T 15:07, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luxembourgish Resistance, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hans Adam (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

Question

Could you take a look here [1], thanks. --HistoryofIran (talk) 10:06, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Errr.. --HistoryofIran (talk) 12:24, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

"Errr..." what? I edit Wikipedia in my own free time and as a volunteer, and have been busy with my job in real life recently, so please don't post passive-aggressive messages on my Talk page like I'm somehow dragging my heels. I have given you Peer Review feedback on your article in the past as a courtesy. I am not under any obligation to give additional feedback. Yes, I can see you have improved the article. Dr Gangrene (talk) 20:22, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Passive-aggressive messages? i did not mean to be that, if i did then i am sorry?? You could have at least said that some time ago, and then i wouldn't bother you. By the way, thanks for the help you gave on the peer review. --HistoryofIran (talk) 21:15, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

Wikilinking

Hi, and thanks for your work on the English Wikipedia.

I noticed an article you worked on. Just a short note to point out that we don’t normally link:

• dates
• years
• commonly known geographical terms (including well-known country-names), and
• common terms you’d look up in a dictionary (unless significantly technical).

This applies to infoboxes, too.

Thanks, and my best wishes.

Tony (talk) 13:16, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Elections in Luxemburg

I'm working on a long term project on collection international election results. Template:Luxembourg elections does not contain the pre-WWI-elections, and it might be possible that you can add the missing years: I saw that you did use the book

• Nicolas Als, Robert L. Philippart: La Chambre des Députés, Histoire et Lieux de Travail, Chambre des Députés du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg, 1994

in Antoine Pescatore. Does that book mention elections date or has lists of deputies?--Antemister (talk) 20:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Freemasonry in Luxembourg

A brief note to say thank you for a useful and comprehensive article. I gave it a C, but with a few more references and only a little polishing, it could easily pass GA status. Well done. Fiddlersmouth (talk) 00:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Maggy Nagel

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Maggy Nagel, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.gouvernement.lu/3456047/CV-en.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:30, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Freemasonry by country

Template:Freemasonry by country has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. MSJapan (talk) 08:44, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dupong-Krier Ministry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page René Blum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Juncker–Poos Ministry, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Reich Ministry of Economics listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Reich Ministry of Economics. Since you had some involvement with the Reich Ministry of Economics redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 10:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 27 August

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Irish migration to Great Britain page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Dr Gangrene. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 19:25, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Dr Gangrene. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dr Gangrene. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Dr Gangrene. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

"FIEE" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect FIEE has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 May 21 § FIEE until a consensus is reached. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 18:26, 21 May 2023 (UTC)

Luxembourg elections

Hello. Thanks for your new articles on Luxembourg elections. Do you know if they took place every three years as scheduled from 1848 until 1914? If so, we can add the entire list of missing ones to the template, rather than adding them one-by-one as you create the articles. Cheers, Number 57 09:11, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Thanks!

Sadly I do not know that. In principle (from what I've read) they were meant to be every 3 years. However there might have been an early election some year for political reasons or something. However, my knowledge of Luxembourgish political history isn't good enough to know that ... Tbh I'm working my way through the sources (newspapers) every 3 years, so was intending to just add them like that Dr Gangrene (talk) 22:38, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

Good work on the continued stream of articles! Just to let you know, you only need to write out a note once if you are using note names to repeat them (see this diff for how the code looks). Cheers, Number 57 13:44, 6 January 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
465		Friends Arena (talk)	Add sources
16		Victor Thorn (talk)	Add sources
6		Émile Krieps (talk)	Add sources
102		Reichskommissariat of Belgium and Northern France (talk)	Add sources
1,208		Lockheed L-1011 TriStar (talk)	Add sources
139		Battle of Vianden (talk)	Add sources
3		Lëtzebuerg Privat (talk)	Cleanup
158		Teufelsberg (talk)	Cleanup
48		Structure of the Swiss Armed Forces (talk)	Cleanup
50		Banque et Caisse d'Épargne de l'État (talk)	Expand
30		Constitution of Luxembourg (talk)	Expand
36		Military history of Latvia during World War II (talk)	Expand
21		406th Air Expeditionary Wing (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
18		Radio Luxembourg (DRM) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
29		Deconstruction (building) (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
432		Government of France (talk)	Merge
168		Wehrmacht foreign volunteers and conscripts (talk)	Merge
6		Luxembourg rebellion (talk)	Merge
48		Education in Luxembourg (talk)	Wikify
16		Sandweiler (talk)	Wikify
21		Schueberfouer (talk)	Wikify
40		Rolf Sorg (talk)	Orphan
17		Outline of the U.S. Air Force in Europe at the end of the Cold War (talk)	Orphan
3		Dudelange train collision (talk)	Orphan
3		Speedway Grand Prix of Scandinavia (talk)	Stub
4		Cents, Luxembourg (talk)	Stub
8		Charles-Mathias Simons (talk)	Stub
4		Midwest Universities Consortium for International Activities (talk)	Stub
12		Bonnevoie (talk)	Stub
10		Limpertsberg (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Limpertsberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lycée Robert Schuman. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 29 November 2023 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dr Gangrene. Thank you for your work on Bourbon Plateau. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 07:37, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dr Gangrene. Thank you for your work on 1881 Luxembourg general election. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:40, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dr Gangrene. Thank you for your work on 1887 Luxembourg general election. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:10, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	I'd been waiting for you to finish that 1860 article for a while before sending you this – amazing work on completing the Luxembourg election series! Number 57 00:12, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Er, perhaps I spoke too soon! Number 57 08:41, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Congratulations on re-completing the set ;) Number 57 20:47, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
21		Minister of Fisheries, Oceans and the Canadian Coast Guard (talk)	Add sources
92		German occupation of Luxembourg during World War II (talk)	Add sources
1,221		Luxembourgish (talk)	Add sources
110		Belarusian resistance during World War II (talk)	Add sources
32		Volksdeutsche Bewegung (talk)	Add sources
5		Jean Bernard (priest) (talk)	Add sources
26		Michael Fortier (talk)	Cleanup
86		Conservative Party of Canada (1867–1942) (talk)	Cleanup
95		Catholic Church and politics in the United States (talk)	Cleanup
262		Princess Louise Margaret of Prussia (talk)	Expand
633		The Republicans (France) (talk)	Expand
21		Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Besançon (talk)	Expand
203		Second Hundred Years' War (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
191		Nacht und Nebel (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
126		Goralenvolk (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
42		Catholic lay organisations (talk)	Merge
622		British Ceylon (talk)	Merge
13		Besanosaurus (talk)	Merge
11		Davie Fulton (talk)	Wikify
16		Marc Dalton (talk)	Wikify
62		Official party status (talk)	Wikify
1		Betty Noël (talk)	Orphan
2		Bastatika (talk)	Orphan
1		Blotilé (talk)	Orphan
8		Hubert Loutsch (talk)	Stub
7		D'Lëtzebuerger Land (talk)	Stub
9		Félix de Blochausen (talk)	Stub
4		Alfred Duranleau (talk)	Stub
3		William Gordon Ernst (talk)	Stub
6		Woxx (talk)	Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 18:20, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cholera epidemics in Luxembourg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lycée Robert Schuman.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:50, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Dr Gangrene, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! —Tom Morris (talk) 18:13, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Dr Gangrene. Thank you for your work on International Steel Agreement. North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:01, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dr Gangrene. Thank you for your work on Notre-Dame Cemetery (Luxembourg). Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:22, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi Dr Gangrene. Thank you for your work on Courrier du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg. Another editor, SunDawn, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 01:26, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in a research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC)

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:41, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:08, 19 November 2024 (UTC)